top of page

SAP ADVISORY

The enterprise platform for complex, regulated, and multi-entity environments. Full-stack module coverage from FI to BTP. Senior-led delivery. No sub-contractors on anything that matters.

S/4HANA without the
wreckage of a large SI.

MODULE COVERAGE

Full stack. 

FI · CO · MM · SD · PP · QM · WM · SuccessFactors · Ariba · BTP.

Every module covered in-house. No routing critical deliverables to partners who don't know your data, your workarounds, or the decisions made in week two of the project.

See the pharma rescue case

What We Do

S/4HANA Migration

s4 hana card.png

ECC end of support is not a deadline. It is a decision point.

Greenfield Implementation

greenfield card.png

Build the SAP landscape your business actually needs.

Application Management & Support

apms card.png

Go-live is not the end. It is the beginning of the real work.

SAP BTP & Analytics

btp card.png

Integration that outlasts the engagement.

s4 hana bg.png

S/4HANA Migration

ECC end of support is not a deadline. It is a decision point.

The standard migration failure pattern: an oversized SI team arrives, inflates scope, and delivers an eighteen-month timeline that becomes thirty-six. The client pays. The SI bills.
 

Advait begins with a selective data migration assessment. What must migrate. What gets rebuilt clean. What can be retired. Brownfield where it preserves institutional value. Greenfield where it creates new capability. No sub-contractors on the critical path.
 

European pharma, $2B: inherited a failed Big 4 brownfield. Hybrid migration completed in 14 months, 30% under budget, zero data loss, FDA compliance integrated at module level — not retrofitted.

14 mo

avg migration timeline

30%

under budget, average

Zero

data loss record

FDA

compliance integrated at module level

greenfield bg.png

Greenfield Implementation

Build the SAP landscape your business actually needs.

Greenfield for organisations building a new SAP landscape, or for those whose brownfield complexity has reached the point where a clean start is the better path. Scope definition, design, configuration, testing, go-live, and hypercare under one engagement.
 

Every module. Every legal entity. Every integration point — designed by the partner who leads delivery. Structured to be maintainable by your internal team after the engagement closes.
 

Manufacturing group, $350M: full greenfield S/4HANA across 4 legal entities. On-schedule go-live. AMS contract renewed twice. Average ticket resolution: 5.8 hours.

Full Stack

FI · CO · MM · SD · PP · QM · WM

100%

on-time go-live rate

Same team

design to delivery to AMS

98.9%

SLA adherence post-go-live

apms bg_edited.jpg

Application Management & Support

Go-live is not the end. It is the beginning of the real work.

Most SAP implementations stall here. The implementing partner closes the project. A support team arrives that learned the landscape from documentation, not from the decisions made during build.
 

Advait's AMS model runs on one principle: the team that implemented supports it. They know why the custom BAPI was written. They know what the MM workaround was covering. You do not explain yourself twice.
 

The team that built the system supports it. Average ticket resolution: 5.8 hours. 24/7 coverage. 98.9% SLA adherence.

24/7

global AMS coverage

1-2hr

avg SAP ticket resolution

98.9%

SLA adherence

Same team

implementation to support

sap bg_edited.jpg

SAP BTP & Analytics

Integration that outlasts the engagement.

Most SI-led BTP implementations pass the demo. They do not survive production data volumes, third-party system complexity, or version updates the original team is no longer on-site to absorb.
 

Advait's BTP practice starts with the business outcome. Data pipelines that close correctly. APIs that survive version changes. Analytics a CFO reads without a consultant translating. SAC, embedded S/4HANA analytics, and ABAP extensions on the Build side.
 

Logistics company, $150M: BTP integration across 7 third-party systems. Real-time P&L by lane. Month-end close reduced from 12 days to 4.8 days.

7 systems

avg integration scope

SAC 

certified delivery

60%

reduction in month-end close time

Zero

rework on version updates

Case Study

SAP Advisory · Life Sciences

$2B European pharma — inherited failed Big 4 brownfield.
Live in 14 months, 30% under budget.

14 months

to go-live from a failed prior attempt

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Platform selection follows the technology assessment. Advait weighs regulatory complexity, entity count, existing integration landscape, budget, and growth trajectory. We hold no vendor preference — the recommendation carries only the rationale the business case supports. Where both platforms serve different divisions, we design the architecture that connects them.

  • Yes. For organisations running both platforms, Advait provides unified AMS under one commercial model. One team, one SLA, one point of accountability. No contradictions between separate vendors on the same data.

  • On SAP, Advait is independent — we hold no reseller or preferred partner relationship, which means our recommendations carry no vendor incentive. On Odoo, we hold Gold Partner status, with functional and technical certification across the suite applied with sector judgement.

  • Yes. We begin with a forensic assessment of the structural conditions that caused the failure, not the presenting symptoms. We have completed programmes others abandoned — including the $2B pharma brownfield rescue in our Work section.

  • A standard single-entity Odoo implementation reaches first go-live in 8–12 weeks. An SAP S/4HANA greenfield for a mid-market scope runs 12–18 months. Complex multi-entity programmes on either platform run to scope, not to a generic estimate. Timelines are fixed at scope definition and do not adjust as the engagement progresses.

bottom of page